Eve Online – AT7 Day 6 – Final – Pandemic Legion v Circle-Of-Two

Alliance Tournament 7 - Day 6 Finals - Fight 15 - Final - Pandemic Legion v Circle-Of-Two Sign up for a free 14 day tr...



Alliance Tournament 7 – Day 6 Finals – Fight fifteen – Final – Pandemic Legion v Circle-Of-Two Sign up for the giveaway fourteen day hearing (No credit label required) during secure.eve-online.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

25 Responses to “Eve Online – AT7 Day 6 – Final – Pandemic Legion v Circle-Of-Two”

  1. CheifTucker says:

    @AuzSoldier05 any thought when which is?

  2. gibblets17 says:

    @Trashjack101 i know during a commencement of this tourney here they where observant which they dont consider most of it.

  3. 1993futuremarine says:

    i adore secrecy bombers. they have been such flog donkey ships

  4. PizdaTiMaterina says:

    yea abaddons have been barns

  5. IzoTarrok says:

    10:53

  6. AuzSoldier05 says:

    Man those secrecy Bombers during a begin was AWESOME!!!!!!!. Cant Wait to see what they have in store for a 2010 final.

  7. LtSurge659 says:

    Will EVE ever strike World Game Events/eSports?

    Dust 514 Tourneys…. ohh fantasies

  8. ericeclifford says:

    @MrJohnny56789 Exactly because we give up this game,

    They shift a latest season of a month each month, certain a a GREAT SANDBOX MMORPG, though a PVP offset is not focused by a devs or they have been only solid dense as well as siphon during balancing, possibly way, TRY DARKFALL, FPS combat, Just got balanced!

  9. wickedchicken84 says:

    I am so happyu to see a CO2 backstabbing group die similar to this, yet we wouldnt repudiate they have been great during pvp, it still warms a core of my pvp ships to see them die similar to this hahah :) . Yay!

  10. fightcancer says:

    So most improved explanation than AT8!

  11. Atremious says:

    There is the opposite for frigates. They occur to be called Destroyers

  12. ScienceGaveMeAHadron says:

    @SadisticStang There needs to be a little balancing cause put in which acts both ways, as we pronounced a vast ships cannot strike frigates so there should be something identical behaving a alternative way, a disproportion in illness isn’t which good given we have no goal of deleterious a frig with vast guns. Frigates should understanding a really tiny volume of repairs to battleships. As we see in this vid a people who win have been PL with vast amounts of tiny frigate variants.

  13. ScienceGaveMeAHadron says:

    Yeah we was exaggerating, many immeasurable alliances have been built upon immeasurable swift actions, we fool around a diversion a decent volume as well as have finished given 2007 :) . The usually thing is we fool around swift accessible ‘realistic’ purposes such as a Rokh immeasurable rails as well as immeasurable ships, however a immeasurable infancy of little PvP fights have been fought in little interceptors that do not understanding a vastly not as big volume of repairs than battleships deliberation a distance disproportion as well as it’s intensely stupid when frigates shock of battleships

  14. SadisticStang says:

    @ScienceGaveMeAHadron Maybe not 99%, yet there really needs to be the little realism receiving in to comment here – those sorts of rigs usually do not have the weapons cargo to take down Battleships or similar.

    Though carrying pronounced that, not all PVP is this party usually worth contest fool around which you see. They have been copiousness of critical tactical engagements, which final the lot longer than 10 minutes.

  15. ScienceGaveMeAHadron says:

    This diversion is 99% people drifting in frigs during 2000m/s murdering the battleship as well as 1% Haw-some swift battles.

    Seriously it’s only solid foolish which little frigates can fall short battleships, there’s needs to be a little critical balancing of T2 Assaults/interceptors which fly similar to they have been upon crack.

  16. Paracaz says:

    @mike1220115 i can entice 21day trial.. i payed 2 months only.. right away shopping with diversion income diversion time ;- )

  17. Averyfane says:

    @Paracaz review his comment- he didn’t contend it has anything to do with Koreans :p

  18. MrJohnny56789 says:

    well that proves it. this diversion isnt about strategy as well as accumulation though regulating the single Op function.

    Notice how the destroyers, that have been spposed to be written to kill frigate sized ships, were all insufficient as well as invalid in this fight. approach to go CCP, the invalid ship! :thumbsup:

  19. Bluecewe says:

    @zepheyr Its an eSport event. :)

  20. KeanuLmao says:

    I similar to a diversion though the unequivocally complicating, I’ll hang with COD or Halo.

  21. tylrdubya says:

    Co2 got raped which had to be the large dignified diminution but
    good pursuit pestilence multitude o7

  22. Paracaz says:

    @enCODed3

    what does night before have to do with Koreans???

  23. Paracaz says:

    @mike1220115

    if any one needs 21day hearing entice , pm me

  24. Shaloth says:

    if we put it which approach 1v1 afterwards patently yeah a tittan is a many appropriate boat in a game. though lets be genuine about it… many PVP fights wouldnt occur which way

  25. darian1968 says:

    i consider what ever boat we fly if we can have it work for you. afterwards others can only understanding with it. or in matches similar to this we will see afterwards go bye bye faster afterwards we ever suspicion VIII subsequent year.

Leave a Reply